|
West
Virginia Highway Safety Office
Home Page
|
|
2 Hale
Street - Suite 100
Charleston, WV 25301
|
Phone:
(304) 558-6080
FAX: (304) 558-6083
|
|
Office Hours: 9:00AM - 5:00PM |







 |
Governor’s
Highway Safety Program
(Click Tabs For More
Information)
Program
Guidelines
|
IMPAIRED DRIVING
|
|
West Virginia, in cooperation with its
political subdivisions, will have a comprehensive program to
combat impaired driving. This guideline describes the areas that
each sub-grantee should address. Throughout this guideline,
"impaired driving" means operating any motor vehicle while one's
faculties are affected by alcohol or other drugs, medications,
or other substances. "Impaired driving" includes, but is not
limited to, impairment as defined in the West Virginia State
Code.
|
PREVENTION
|
|
Each sub-grantee should have prevention
programs to reduce impaired driving through approaches commonly
associated with public health -- altering social norms, changing
risky or dangerous behaviors, and creating protective
environments. Prevention and public health programs promote
activities to educate the public on the effects of alcohol and
other drugs, limit alcohol and drug availability, and prevent
those impaired by alcohol and drugs from driving. Prevention
programs are typically carried out in schools, work sites,
medical and health care facilities, and community groups. Each
sub-grantee should implement a system of impaired driving
prevention activities and work with the traffic safety, health
and medical communities to foster health and reduce
traffic-related injuries and their resulting costs.
|
A. Public Information and Education for Prevention
|
|
Sub-grantees should develop and implement
public information and education (PI&E) programs directed at
impaired driving, and reducing the risk of injury or death
and their resulting medical, legal and other costs. Programs
should start at the sub-grantee agency level and extend
throughout the community through sub-grantee assistance,
model programs, and public encouragement. Sub-grantees
should:
-
Have a plan, program, and coordinator for
all impaired driving PI&E activities;
Develop their own PI&E campaigns and
materials, either by adapting materials, or by creating new
campaigns and materials;
Encourage and support communities to
implement awareness programs at the local level;
Encourage businesses and private
organizations to participate in impaired driving PI&E
campaigns; and
-
Encourage media to support impaired driving highway safety
issues by reporting on programs, activities (including
enforcement campaigns), alcohol-related arrests, and
alcohol-related crashes.
|
B. School Programs
|
|
Student programs, including kindergarten
through college and trade school, play a critical role in
preventing impaired driving. Sub-grantees should:
Implement K-12 traffic safety education, with
appropriate emphasis on impaired driving, as part of a
comprehensive health education program;
Establish and support student safety clubs and
activities and create a statewide network linking these
groups;
Establish liaisons with higher education institutions to
encourage policies to reduce alcohol, other drug, and
traffic safety problems on college campuses;
Promote alcohol and drug free events throughout the
school year, with particular emphasis on high-risk times
such as prom, spring break, and graduation;
Coordinate closely with anti-drug education efforts and
programs;
Develop working relationships with school health
personnel as a means of providing information to students
about a variety of traffic safety and health behaviors; and
Make effective use of criminal justice, medical or other
professionals through presentations in the classroom or
assembly programs.
|
C. Employer Programs
|
|
Sub-grantees should provide information
and technical assistance to all employers, encouraging them
to offer programs to reduce impaired driving by employees
and their families. These programs should include:
- Model policies for impaired driving and other traffic
safety issues, including safety belt use and speeding;
Management training to recognize and address alcohol and
drug impairment;
Education and treatment programs for employees; and
Employee awareness activities.
States should especially encourage
companies and businesses to provide impaired driving
programs to their youthful employees. The sub-grantee
should also be familiar with FHWA's drug and alcohol
requirements for employers of commercial motor vehicle (CMV)
drivers.
|
D. Responsible Alcohol Service
|
|
Sub-grantees should promote responsible
alcohol service policies and practices through social host
programs and well-publicized and enforced laws, regulations,
policies and education in the retail alcohol service
industry (including package stores, restaurants, and
taverns). Sub-grantees should:
- Implement and enforce programs to eliminate the sale or
service of alcoholic beverages to those under 21 years of
age;
Promote alcohol server and service programs, including
assessments, written policies, and training;
Ensure adequate alcohol control programs dealing with
issues such as service to visibly intoxicated patrons and
the elimination of "happy hours" during which free or
reduced- price alcoholic beverages are offered (food and
non-alcoholic beverages may be offered instead during such
times);
Provide adequate resources to enforce alcohol beverage
control regulations;
Promote the display of responsible alcohol use and
drinking and driving information in alcohol sales and
service establishments;
Promote participation in designated driver, safe rides,
and other alternative transportation programs; and
Provide information that commercial establishments may
be held responsible for damages caused by any patron who was
served alcohol when visibly intoxicated.
|
E. Transportation Alternatives
|
|
Sub-grantees should promote alternative
transportation programs that enable drinkers to reach their
destinations without driving. Alternative transportation
programs include:
- Designated drivers; and Safe rides.
|
DETERRENCE
|
|
Each sub-grantee should have a
deterrence program to reduce impaired driving through activities
to create the maximum possible perception of detection, arrest
and punishment among persons who might be tempted to drive under
the influence of alcohol or other drugs, including CMV drivers.
Close coordination with law enforcement agencies on the
municipal, county, and state levels is needed to create and
sustain the perceived risk of being detected and arrested.
Specialized traffic enforcement efforts, such as the Motor
Carrier Safety Assistance Program (MCSAP), also serve as a core
element in the detection of impaired drivers. Equally close
coordination with courts and the motor vehicle licensing and
registration agency is needed to enhance the fear of punishment.
Effective use of all available media is essential to create and
maintain a strong public awareness of impaired driving
enforcement and sanctions.
Each sub-grantee should
implement a system of activities to deter impaired driving. The
deterrence system should include public information and
education, enforcement, prosecution, adjudication, criminal
sanctions, driver licensing, and vehicle registration
activities. The goal should be to increase the perception and
probability of arrest for violators and the imposition of swift
and sure sanctions.
|
|
A. Public Information and Education
for Deterrence
Sub-grantees should implement public
information and education (PI&E) programs to maximize public
perception of the risks of being caught and punished for
impaired driving. Public information programs should be:
Comprehensive;
Seasonally focused; and Sustained.
|
|
B. Enforcement
Sub-grantees should implement
comprehensive enforcement programs to maximize the
likelihood of detecting, investigating, arresting, and
convicting impaired drivers. These programs should:
- Secure a commitment to rigorous impaired driving
enforcement from the top levels of police management;
- Provide state-of-the-art training for police officers,
including Standardized Field Sobriety Testing (SFST) and
Drug Evaluation and Classification (DEC);
- Deploy patrol resources effectively, using cooperative
efforts of various State and local police agencies as
appropriate;
- Maximize the likelihood of violator-officer contact;
- Make regular use of sobriety checkpoints;
- Facilitate the arrest process;
- Implement state-of-the-art post-arrest investigation of
apprehended impaired drivers;
- Emphasize enforcement of youth impaired driving and
drinking age laws; and
- Emphasize enforcement of laws regulating alcohol or drug
impairment by CMV drivers.
|
|
C. Prosecution
Sub-grantees should implement a
comprehensive program for visible and aggressive prosecution
of impaired driving cases. These programs should:
Give impaired driving cases high priority for
prosecution;
Provide sufficient resources to prosecute cases
presented by law enforcement efforts;
Facilitate uniformity and consistency in prosecution of
impaired driving cases;
Provide training for prosecutors so they can obtain high
rates of conviction and seek appropriate sanctions for
offenders;
Encourage vigorous prosecution of alcohol-related
fatality and injury cases under both impaired driving and
general criminal statutes; and
- Ensure that prosecutors are knowledgeable and prepared
to prosecute youthful offenders appropriately.
|
|
D. Adjudication |
|
The effectiveness of prosecution and enforcement efforts is
lost without support and strength in adjudication.
Sub-grantees should implement a comprehensive impaired
driving adjudication program to:
• Provide sufficient resources to
adjudicate cases and manage the dockets brought before
them;
• Facilitate uniformity and consistency
in adjudication of impaired driving cases;
• Give judges the skills necessary to
appropriately adjudicate impaired driving cases;
• Inform the judiciary about technical
evidence presented in impaired driving cases, including
SFST and DEC testimony;
• Educate the judiciary in appropriate
and aggressive sanctions for offenders including violators
of commercial motor vehicle safety regulations; and
• Ensure that judges are knowledgeable
and prepared to adjudicate youthful offenders cases in an
appropriate and aggressive manner.
|
TREATMENT AND REHABILITATION
|
|
Many first-time impaired driving offenders
and most repeat offenders have substantial substance abuse
problems that affect their entire lives, not just their driving.
They have been neither prevented nor deterred from impaired
driving. Each Sub-grantee should implement a system to identify
and refer these drivers to appropriate substance abuse treatment
programs to change their dangerous behavior.
|
A. Diagnosis and Screening
|
|
Sub-grantees should have a systematic
program to evaluate persons who have been convicted of an
impaired driving offense to determine if they have an
alcohol or drug abuse problem. This evaluation should:
- Be conducted by qualified personnel prior
to sentencing; and
- Be used to decide whether a substance
abuse treatment program should be part of the sanctions
imposed.
|
B. Treatment and Rehabilitation
|
|
Sub-grantees should establish and
maintain programs to treat alcohol and other drug dependent
persons referred through traffic courts and other sources.
These programs should:
-
Ensure that those referred for impaired
driving offenses are not permitted to drive again until
their substance abuse problems are under control;
Be conducted in addition
to, not as a substitute for, license restrictions and other
sanctions; and
-
Be conducted separately
for youth.
|
PROGRAM MANAGEMENT
|
|
Good program management produces effective
programs. Planning and coordination are especially important for
impaired driving activities, since many different parties are
involved. Each Sub-grantee's impaired driving program management
system should have an established process for managing its
planning (including problem identification), program control,
and evaluation activities. The system should provide for a local
task forces and data analysis. It also should include planning
and coordination of activities with other agencies involved in
impaired driving programs and expansion of existing
partnerships, such as with the health and medical communities.
|
A. Program Planning
|
|
Sub-grantees should develop and implement
an overall plan for all impaired driving activities. The
plan should:
- Be based on careful problem definition that makes use of
crash and driver record data; and
- Direct community resources toward effective measures
that address impaired driving issues.
|
B. Program Control
|
|
Sub-grantees should establish procedures
to ensure that program activities are implemented as
intended. The procedures should provide for systematic
monitoring and review of ongoing programs to:
- Detect and correct problems quickly;
Measure progress in achieving established
goals and objectives; and
Ensure that appropriate data are
collected for evaluation.
|
C. Local Task Forces & Other Injury Control Programs
|
|
Sub-grantees should encourage the
development of community impaired driving task forces and
community traffic safety and other injury control programs.
Sub-grantees should.
- Use these groups to bring a wide variety of interests
and resources to bear on impaired driving issues;
Ensure that Federal, State, and local organizations
coordinate impaired driving activities, so that the
activities complement rather than compete with each other;
and
Ensure that these groups include traditional and
non-traditional partners, such as law enforcement, local
government, business, education, community groups, health,
medicine, prosecutors and judges.
|
D. Data and Records
|
|
Sub-grantees should establish and
maintain records systems for accidents, arrests,
dispositions, driver licenses, and vehicle registrations.
Especially important are tracking systems that can provide
information on every driver arrested for DWI to determine
the disposition of the case and compliance with sanctions.
These records systems should be:
Timely;
Able to be linked to each other; and
Readily accessible to police, courts, and
planners.
|
E. Evaluation
|
|
Sub-grantees should evaluate all impaired
driving system activities regularly to ensure that programs
are effective and scarce resources are allocated
appropriately. Evaluation should be:
- Designed to use available traffic records and other
injury control data systems effectively;
Included in initial program planning to ensure that
appropriate data are available and that adequate resources
are allocated; and
Conducted regularly.
Evaluation results should be:
Reported regularly to project and program
managers; and
Used to guide further program activities.
|
|
OCCUPANT PROTECTION
|
|
West Virginia, in cooperation with its
political subdivisions, will have a comprehensive occupant
protection program that educates and motivates its citizens to
use available motor vehicle occupant protection systems. A
combination of use requirements, enforcement, public
information, education, and incentives is necessary to achieve
significant, lasting increases in safety belt usage, which will
prevent fatalities and control the number and severity of
injuries. Therefore, a well-balanced State occupant protection
program will include the components described below.
|
|
PROGRAM MANAGEMENT
Each sub-grantee should have centralized program planning,
implementation and coordination to achieve and sustain high
rates of safety belt use. Evaluation is also important for
determining progress and ultimate success of occupant protection
programs. The sub-grantee should:
Provide leadership, training, and technical assistance to
other agencies and local occupant protection programs and
projects;
Convene an occupant protection advisory task force or
coalition to organize and generate broad-based support for
programs;
Integrate occupant protection programs into
community/corridor traffic safety and other injury prevention
programs; and
Evaluate the effectiveness of its occupant
protection program.
|
|
LEGISLATION, REGULATION, AND POLICY
Each sub-grantee should enact and enforce occupant protection
use regulations and policies to provide clear guidance to the
motoring public concerning motor vehicle occupant protection
systems. This framework should include:
Require all motor vehicle occupants to use the systems
provided by the vehicle manufacturer and educational programs
to explain their benefits and the correct way to use them;
Require children up to 40 pounds to ride in a safety
device certified by the manufacturer to meet all applicable
Federal performance standards;
Require employees of all levels of government to wear
safety belts when traveling on official business;
Require that organizations receiving Federal highway
safety program grant funds have and enforce an employee safety
belt use policy; and
|
|
ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM
Each sub-grantee should have a strong law enforcement program,
coupled with public information and education, to increase
safety belt and child safety seat use. Essential components of a
law enforcement program include:
Written, enforced belt use policies for law enforcement
agencies with sanctions for noncompliance to protect law
enforcement officers from harm and for officers to serve as
role models for the motoring public;
Vigorous enforcement of public safety belt use and child
safety seat laws, including citations and warnings;
Accurate reporting of occupant protection system
information on accident report forms, including use or non-use
of belts or child safety seats, type of belt, and presence of
and deployment of air bag;
Public information and education (PI&E) campaigns to
inform the public about occupant protection laws and related
enforcement activities;
Routine monitoring of citation rates for non-use of safety
belts and child safety seats; and
Certification of an occupant protection training course
for both basic and in-service training by the Police (or
Peace) Officer Standards and Training (POST) board.
|
|
PUBLIC INFORMATION AND EDUCATION
PROGRAM
As part of each State's public information and education
program, each sub-grantee should enlist the support of a variety
of media, including mass media, to improve public awareness and
knowledge about safety belts, air bags, and child safety seats.
To sustain or increase rates of safety belt and child safety
seat use, a well organized, effectively managed public
information program should:
Identify and target specific audiences, (e.g., low-use,
high risk motorists) and develop messages appropriate for
these audiences;
Address the enforcement of the State's belt use and child
passenger safety laws; the safety benefits of regular, correct
safety belt (both manual and automatic) and child safety seat
use; and the additional protection provided by air bags;
Capitalize on special events, such as nationally
recognized safety and injury prevention weeks and local
enforcement campaigns;
Coordinate different materials and media campaigns where
practicable, (e.g., by using a common theme and logo);
Use national themes and materials to the fullest extent
possible;
Publicize belt-use surveys and other relevant statistics;
Encourage news media to report belt use and non-use in
motor vehicle crashes;
Involve media representatives in planning and
disseminating public information campaigns;
Encourage private sector groups to incorporate belt-use
messages into their media campaigns;
Take advantage of all media outlets:
television, radio, print, signs, billboards, theaters, sports
events, health fairs; and
Evaluate all media campaign efforts
|
|
HEALTH/MEDICAL PROGRAM
Each State should integrate occupant protection into health
programs. The failure of drivers and passengers to use occupant
protection systems is a major public health problem that must be
recognized by the medical and health care communities. Local
medical organizations should collaborate in developing programs
that:
Integrate occupant protection into professional health
training curricula and comprehensive public health planning;
Promote occupant protection systems as a health
promotion/injury prevention measure;
Require public health and medical personnel
to use available motor vehicle occupant protection systems
when on the job;
Provide technical assistance and education
about the importance of motor vehicle occupant protection to
primary caregivers, (e.g., doctors, nurses, clinic staff);
Include questions about safety belt use in health risk
appraisals;
Utilize health care providers as visible public
spokespersons for belt use and child safety seat use;
Provide information about availability of
child safety seats through maternity hospitals and other
pre-natal and natal care centers; and
Collect, analyze, and publicize data on
additional injuries and medical expenses resulting from
non-use of occupant protection devices.
|
|
CHILD PASSENGER SAFETY PROGRAM
Each sub-grantee should vigorously promote the use of child
safety seats. Sub-grantees should insure that every child up to
40 pounds rides correctly secured in a child safety seat that
meets Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards. Sub-grantees
should establish child passenger safety programs that will help
to:
Educate parents, pediatricians, hospitals,
law enforcement, EMS and the general public about the safety
risks to small children, the benefits of child safety seats,
and their responsibilities for compliance with child passenger
safety laws;
- Encourage child safety seat retailers and
auto dealers to provide information about child seat and
vehicle compatibility, as well as correct use;
- Require safe child transportation policies
for certification of pre-school and day care providers;
- Require hospitals to ensure that newborn
and other small children are correctly secured in an approved
child safety seat or safety belt upon discharge;
- Make child safety seats available at
affordable cost to low-income families, with appropriate
education on how to use them; and
- Encourage local law enforcement to
vigorously enforce child passenger safety laws, including
safety belt use laws as they apply to children.
|
|
SCHOOL-BASED PROGRAM
Buckling up is a good health habit and, like other health
habits, must be taught at an early age and reinforced until the
habit is well established. Sub-grantees should:
Ensure that highway safety and traffic-related injury
control in general, and occupant protection in particular, are
included in local health and safety education curricula;
Establish and enforce written policies
requiring that school employees operating a motor vehicle on
the job use safety belts; and
Encourage active promotion of regular
safety belt use through classroom and extra-curricular
activities as well as in the school-based health clinics.
|
|
WORKSITE PROGRAM
Each sub-grantee should encourage all employers to require
safety belt use on the job. The Federal government has already
taken that step for its employees. Private sector employers
should follow the lead of Federal and State government employers
and comply with all applicable FHWA Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Regulations or Occupational Health and Safety (OSHA) regulations
requiring private business employees to use safety belts on the
job. All sub-grantees should encourage all local employers to:
Establish and enforce a safety belt use
policy with sanctions; and
Conduct occupant protection education
programs for employees on their belt use policies and the
safety benefits of motor vehicle occupant protection.
|
|
OUTREACH PROGRAM
Each sub-grantee should encourage extensive community
involvement in occupant protection education by involving
individuals and organizations outside the traditional highway
safety community. Community involvement broadens public support
for the sub-grantee's programs and can increase the
sub-grantee's ability to deliver highway safety education
programs. To encourage community involvement, sub-grantees
should:
Establish a coalition or task force of individuals and
organizations to actively promote use of occupant protection
systems;
Create an effective communications network
among coalition members to keep members informed; and
Provide materials and resources necessary
to conduct occupant protection education programs, especially
directed toward young people, in local settings.
|
|
EVALUATION PROGRAM
Each sub-grantee should conduct several different types of
evaluation to effectively measure progress and to plan and
implement new program strategies. Program management should:
Conduct and publicize at least two observational surveys
of safety belt and child safety seat use annually, making
every effort to ensure that it meets applicable federal
guidelines;
Maintain trend data on child safety seat
use, safety belt use, and air bag deployment in fatal crashes;
Identify target populations through observational surveys
and crash statistics;
Conduct and publicize statewide surveys of public
knowledge and attitudes about occupant protection laws and
systems;
Obtain monthly or quarterly data from law enforcement
agencies on the number of safety belt and child passenger
safety citations and convictions;
Evaluate the use of program resources and the
effectiveness of existing general public and target population
education programs;
Obtain data on morbidity as well as the
estimated cost of crashes, compare on the basis of safety belt
usage and non-usage; and
Ensure that evaluation results are an
integral part of new program planning and problem
identification.
|
|
POLICE TRAFFIC SERVICES
|
|
West Virginia, in cooperation with its
political subdivisions, will have an efficient and effective
police traffic services (PTS) program to enforce traffic laws,
prevent crashes and their resulting deaths and injuries, assist
the injured, document specific details of individual crashes,
supervise crash clean-up, and restore safe and orderly movement
of traffic. PTS is critical to the success of most traffic
safety countermeasures and to the prevention of traffic-related
injuries. Traffic law enforcement plays an important role in
deterring impaired driving involving alcohol or other drugs,
achieving safety belt use, encouraging compliance with speed
laws, and reducing other unsafe driving actions. Experience has
shown that a combination of highly visible enforcement, public
information, education, and training is necessary to achieve a
significant and lasting impact in reducing crashes, injuries,
and fatalities. At a minimum, a well-balanced statewide PTS
program should be made up of the components detailed below.
|
PROGRAM MANAGEMENT
Planning and Coordination
Centralized program planning,
implementation, and coordination are essential for achieving
and sustaining effective PTS programs. The West Virginia
Governor’s Highway Safety Program (GHSP), in conjunction
with State, county and local law enforcement agencies, will
ensure that these planning and coordinating functions are
performed with regard to the State's traffic safety program,
since law enforcement is a principle component. In carrying
out its responsibility of centralized program planning and
coordination, the GHSP will:
Provide leadership, training, and technical assistance
to State, county and local law enforcement agencies;
Generate broad-based support for enforcement programs;
and
Integrate PTS into community/corridor
traffic safety and other injury prevention programs.
- Program Elements
State, county and local law enforcement
agencies, in conjunction with the GHSP, will establish PTS
as a priority within their total enforcement program. A PTS
program should be built on a foundation of commitment,
coordination, planning, monitoring, and evaluation within
the agency's enforcement program. State, county and local
law enforcement agencies should:
Provide the public with a high quality,
effective PTS system and have enabling legislation and
regulations in place to implement PTS functions;
- Develop and implement a comprehensive
enforcement plan for impaired driving involving alcohol or
other drugs, safety belt use and child passenger safety
laws, speeding, and other hazardous moving violations. The
plan should initiate action to look beyond the issuance of
traffic tickets to include enforcement of laws that cover
the more significant portions of the safety problem and that
address drivers of all types of vehicles, including trucks,
automobiles, and motorcycles;
Develop a cooperative working relationship with other
local, county, and State governmental agencies and community
organizations on traffic safety issues;
Issue and enforce policies on roadside
sobriety checkpoints, safety belt use, pursuit driving,
crash investigating and reporting, speed enforcement, and
serious traffic violations; and
Develop performance measures for PTS that
are both qualitative and quantitative.
|
|
RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
GHSP will encourage law enforcement agencies to develop and
maintain a comprehensive resource management plan to identify
and deploy resources needed to effectively support enforcement
programs. The resource management plan should include a specific
component on traffic enforcement and safety, integrating traffic
enforcement and safety initiatives into a total agency
enforcement program. Law enforcement agencies should:
Conduct periodic assessments of service demands and
resources to meet identified needs;
Develop a comprehensive resource management plan,
including a specific traffic enforcement and safety component;
Define the plan in terms of budget
requirements and services to be provided; and
Develop and implement operational policies
for the deployment of resources to address program demands and
to meet agency goals.
|
|
TRAFFIC LAW ENFORCEMENT
The enforcement of traffic laws and ordinances is a basic
responsibility shared by all law enforcement agencies. The
primary objective of this function is to encourage motorists and
pedestrians to comply voluntarily with the laws. Administrators
should apply their enforcement resources in ways that ensure the
greatest safety impact. Traffic law enforcement programs should
be based on:
Accurate problem identification;
Countermeasures designed to address specific problems;
Enforcement actions applied at appropriate
times and places, coupled with a public information effort
designed to make the motoring public aware of the problem and
the planned enforcement action; and
A system to document and publicize results.
|
PUBLIC INFORMATION AND EDUCATION
Necessity of Public Information and Education
Public awareness and knowledge about
traffic enforcement are essential for sustaining increased
compliance with all traffic laws. This requires a
well-organized, effectively managed public information and
education program. The GHSP, in cooperation with law
enforcement agencies, will develop a statewide public
information and education campaign that:
Identifies and targets specific audiences;
Addresses enforcement of safety belt use and child
passenger safety, impaired driving involving alcohol or
other drugs, speed, and other serious traffic laws;
Capitalizes on special events, such as Click It or
Ticket, Operation C.A.R.E., Child Passenger Safety
Awareness, Buckle Up, America! and Drunk and Drugged Driving
Awareness campaigns;
Identifies and supports the efforts of traffic safety
activist groups and the health and medical community to gain
increased support of and attention to traffic safety and
enforcement;
Uses national themes, events, and materials; and
Motivates the public to support increased enforcement of
traffic laws.
The task of public information can be
divided into two interconnected areas: external and internal
information. Both areas, properly administered, will benefit
the agency and work in concert to accomplish the goal of
establishing and maintaining a positive police-public
relationship.
Development of public information and education functions
by law enforcement agencies:
External
Educate and remind the public about traffic laws and
safe driving behavior;
Disseminate information to the public about agency
activities and accomplishments;
Enhance relationships with news media and the health and
medical community;
Provide safety education and community services;
Provide legislative and judicial information and
support; and
Increase the public's understanding of the enforcement
agency's role in traffic safety.
Internal
Disseminate information about internal activities to
sworn and civilian members of the agency;
Enhance the agency's safety enforcement
role and increase employee understanding and support; and
Recognize employee achievements.
|
|
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
The availability of valid data is critical to any
approach intended to increase the level of highway safety. An
effective records program provides fast and accurate information
to field personnel who are performing primary traffic functions
and to management for decision-making. Data are usually
collected from crash reports, daily officer activity reports
that contain workload and citation information, highway
department records (e.g., traffic volume), citizen complaints,
and officer observations. An effective records program should:
- Provide information rapidly and
accurately;
- Provide routine compilations of data for
management use in the decision making process;
- Provide data for operational planning and
execution;
- Interface with a variety of data systems,
including statewide traffic safety records system; and
- Be accessible to enforcement, planners,
and management.
|
|
TRAINING
Training is one of the most important activities
in a law enforcement agency, and it is essential to support the
special requirements of traffic law enforcement and safety. It
is essential for operational personnel to be prepared to
effectively perform their duties. Traffic enforcement training
can be conducted by the agency, a State agency, or a commercial
trainer.
- Purpose and Goals of Training
Training accomplishes a variety of
important and necessary goals. Proper training should:
Prepare officers to act decisively and correctly;
Increase compliance with agency enforcement goals;
Assist in meeting priorities;
Improve compliance with established policies;
Result in greater productivity and effectiveness;
Foster cooperation and unity of purpose;
Help offset liability actions; and
Motivate and enhance officer
professionalism.
- State, county and local law enforcement
agencies should
:
Periodically assess enforcement activities to determine
training needs;
Require traffic enforcement knowledge and skills in all
recruits;
Provide traffic enforcement in-service training to
experienced officers;
Provide specialized CMV in-service training to traffic
enforcement officers;
Conduct training to implement specialized traffic
enforcement skills, techniques, or programs; and
Train instructors, to increase agency capabilities and
to ensure continuity of specialized enforcement skills and
techniques.
|
|
EVALUATION
The GHSP, in conjunction with State, county
and local law enforcement agencies, will develop a comprehensive
evaluation program to measure progress toward established
project goals and objectives; effectively plan and implement
statewide, county and local PTS programs; optimize the
allocation of limited resources; measure the impact of traffic
enforcement on reducing crime and traffic crashes, injuries, and
deaths; and compare costs of criminal activity to costs of
traffic crashes. Law enforcement managers should:
Include evaluation in initial program planning efforts to
ensure that data will be available and that sufficient
resources will be allocated;
Report results regularly to project and program managers,
to police field commanders and officers, and to the public and
private sectors;
Use results to guide future activities and to assist in
justifying resources to legislative bodies;
Conduct a variety of surveys to assist in determining
program effectiveness, such as roadside sobriety surveys,
speed surveys, license checks, belt use surveys, and surveys
measuring public knowledge and attitudes about traffic
enforcement programs;
Evaluate the effectiveness of services
provided in support of priority traffic safety areas; and
Maintain and report traffic data to the
International Association of Chiefs of Police Traffic Data
Report and other appropriate repositories, such as the
FBI Uniform Crime Report, FHWA's SAFETY NET system,
and annual statewide reports.
|
|
TRAFFIC RECORDS
|
|
West Virginia, in cooperation with its
political subdivisions, will establish and implement a complete
and comprehensive traffic records program. The Statewide program
will include, or provide for, data for the entire State. A
complete and comprehensive traffic records program is essential
for the development and operation of a viable Safety Management
System and effective traffic-related injury control efforts. It
is also essential for the performance of planning, problem
identification, operational management and control, tracking of
safety trends, and the implementation and evaluation of highway
safety countermeasures and activities. It is the essential
ingredient to safety effectiveness and management.
|
|
TRAFFIC RECORDS SYSTEM
To provide a complete and useful record system for safety
program management at both the State and local level, the State
should have a database consisting of the following:
A Crash File with data on the time, environment, and
circumstances of a crash; identification of the vehicles,
drivers, cyclists, occupants, and pedestrians involved; and
documentation of crash consequences (fatalities, injuries,
property damage and violations charged) with the data tied to
a location reference system;
A Driver File or driver history record of licensed drivers
in the State, with data on personal identification and driver
license number, type of license, license status (suspended or
revoked), driver restrictions, driver convictions for traffic
violations, crash history, driver control or improvement
actions, and safety education data;
A Vehicle File with information on identification, and
ownership
A Roadway File with information about
roadway location, identification, and classification as well
as a description of a road's total physical characteristics,
which are tied to a location reference system. This file
should also contain data for normalizing purposes, such as
miles of roadway and average daily traffic (ADT);
- A Commercial Motor Vehicle Crash File which
uses uniform data definitions and collects information on the
vehicle configuration, cargo body type, hazardous materials,
information to identify the motor carrier, as well as
information on the crash;
- A Citation/Conviction File which identifies
the type of citation and the time, date, and location of the
violation; the violator, vehicle and the enforcement agency;
and adjudication action and results, including court of
jurisdiction and fines assessed and collected;
An Emergency Medical Services (EMS) file with emergency
care and victim outcome information about ambulance responses
to crashes, e.g., emergency care unit, care given, injury
data, and times of EMS notification and arrival; information
on emergency facility and hospital care, including Trauma
Registry data; and medical outcome data relative to crash
victims receiving rehabilitation and for those who died as the
result of the crash; and
Provisions for file linkage through common data elements
between the files or through other consistent means;
performance level data as part of the traffic records system;
demographic data to normalize or adjust for exposure when
analyzing the various data in the files; and provisions for
the use of cost data relative to amoun | |