WVDOT Logo West Virginia Department of Transportation, Connecting West Virginia and the World
Home About WVDOT Contacts News Road Conditions Search Weather Site Map

Home: Motorists: DMV: Governor Highway Safety Program


West Virginia Highway Safety Office
Home Page
 

2 Hale Street - Suite 100
Charleston, WV 25301
 

Phone: (304) 558-6080
FAX:   (304) 558-6083
 
Office Hours: 9:00AM - 5:00PM












 

Governor’s Highway Safety Program

(Click Tabs For More Information)

Program Guidelines

IMPAIRED DRIVING
 

West Virginia, in cooperation with its political subdivisions, will have a comprehensive program to combat impaired driving. This guideline describes the areas that each sub-grantee should address. Throughout this guideline, "impaired driving" means operating any motor vehicle while one's faculties are affected by alcohol or other drugs, medications, or other substances. "Impaired driving" includes, but is not limited to, impairment as defined in the West Virginia State Code.
 

PREVENTION
 

Each sub-grantee should have prevention programs to reduce impaired driving through approaches commonly associated with public health -- altering social norms, changing risky or dangerous behaviors, and creating protective environments. Prevention and public health programs promote activities to educate the public on the effects of alcohol and other drugs, limit alcohol and drug availability, and prevent those impaired by alcohol and drugs from driving. Prevention programs are typically carried out in schools, work sites, medical and health care facilities, and community groups. Each sub-grantee should implement a system of impaired driving prevention activities and work with the traffic safety, health and medical communities to foster health and reduce traffic-related injuries and their resulting costs.
 

A. Public Information and Education for Prevention
 

Sub-grantees should develop and implement public information and education (PI&E) programs directed at impaired driving, and reducing the risk of injury or death and their resulting medical, legal and other costs. Programs should start at the sub-grantee agency level and extend throughout the community through sub-grantee assistance, model programs, and public encouragement. Sub-grantees should:

    • Have a plan, program, and coordinator for all impaired driving PI&E activities;

    • Develop their own PI&E campaigns and materials, either by adapting materials, or by creating new campaigns and materials;

    • Encourage and support communities to implement awareness programs at the local level;

    • Encourage businesses and private organizations to participate in impaired driving PI&E campaigns; and

    • Encourage media to support impaired driving highway safety issues by reporting on programs, activities (including enforcement campaigns), alcohol-related arrests, and alcohol-related crashes.

B. School Programs
 

Student programs, including kindergarten through college and trade school, play a critical role in preventing impaired driving. Sub-grantees should:

    • Implement K-12 traffic safety education, with appropriate emphasis on impaired driving, as part of a comprehensive health education program;

    • Establish and support student safety clubs and activities and create a statewide network linking these groups;

    • Establish liaisons with higher education institutions to encourage policies to reduce alcohol, other drug, and traffic safety problems on college campuses;

    • Promote alcohol and drug free events throughout the school year, with particular emphasis on high-risk times such as prom, spring break, and graduation;

    • Coordinate closely with anti-drug education efforts and programs;

    • Develop working relationships with school health personnel as a means of providing information to students about a variety of traffic safety and health behaviors; and

    • Make effective use of criminal justice, medical or other professionals through presentations in the classroom or assembly programs.
C. Employer Programs
 

Sub-grantees should provide information and technical assistance to all employers, encouraging them to offer programs to reduce impaired driving by employees and their families. These programs should include:

    • Model policies for impaired driving and other traffic safety issues, including safety belt use and speeding;

    • Management training to recognize and address alcohol and drug impairment;

    • Education and treatment programs for employees; and

    • Employee awareness activities.

States should especially encourage companies and businesses to provide impaired driving programs to their youthful employees. The sub-grantee should also be familiar with FHWA's drug and alcohol requirements for employers of commercial motor vehicle (CMV) drivers.

D. Responsible Alcohol Service
 

Sub-grantees should promote responsible alcohol service policies and practices through social host programs and well-publicized and enforced laws, regulations, policies and education in the retail alcohol service industry (including package stores, restaurants, and taverns). Sub-grantees should:

    • Implement and enforce programs to eliminate the sale or service of alcoholic beverages to those under 21 years of age;

    • Promote alcohol server and service programs, including assessments, written policies, and training;

    • Ensure adequate alcohol control programs dealing with issues such as service to visibly intoxicated patrons and the elimination of "happy hours" during which free or reduced- price alcoholic beverages are offered (food and non-alcoholic beverages may be offered instead during such times);

    • Provide adequate resources to enforce alcohol beverage control regulations;

    • Promote the display of responsible alcohol use and drinking and driving information in alcohol sales and service establishments;

    • Promote participation in designated driver, safe rides, and other alternative transportation programs; and

    • Provide information that commercial establishments may be held responsible for damages caused by any patron who was served alcohol when visibly intoxicated.

E. Transportation Alternatives
 

Sub-grantees should promote alternative transportation programs that enable drinkers to reach their destinations without driving. Alternative transportation programs include:

    • Designated drivers; and Safe rides.
DETERRENCE
 

Each sub-grantee should have a deterrence program to reduce impaired driving through activities to create the maximum possible perception of detection, arrest and punishment among persons who might be tempted to drive under the influence of alcohol or other drugs, including CMV drivers. Close coordination with law enforcement agencies on the municipal, county, and state levels is needed to create and sustain the perceived risk of being detected and arrested. Specialized traffic enforcement efforts, such as the Motor Carrier Safety Assistance Program (MCSAP), also serve as a core element in the detection of impaired drivers. Equally close coordination with courts and the motor vehicle licensing and registration agency is needed to enhance the fear of punishment. Effective use of all available media is essential to create and maintain a strong public awareness of impaired driving enforcement and sanctions.

Each sub-grantee should implement a system of activities to deter impaired driving. The deterrence system should include public information and education, enforcement, prosecution, adjudication, criminal sanctions, driver licensing, and vehicle registration activities. The goal should be to increase the perception and probability of arrest for violators and the imposition of swift and sure sanctions.
 

A. Public Information and Education for Deterrence

Sub-grantees should implement public information and education (PI&E) programs to maximize public perception of the risks of being caught and punished for impaired driving. Public information programs should be:

    • Comprehensive;
    • Seasonally focused; and Sustained.
B. Enforcement

Sub-grantees should implement comprehensive enforcement programs to maximize the likelihood of detecting, investigating, arresting, and convicting impaired drivers. These programs should:

    • Secure a commitment to rigorous impaired driving enforcement from the top levels of police management;

    • Provide state-of-the-art training for police officers, including Standardized Field Sobriety Testing (SFST) and Drug Evaluation and Classification (DEC);

    • Deploy patrol resources effectively, using cooperative efforts of various State and local police agencies as appropriate;

    • Maximize the likelihood of violator-officer contact;

    • Make regular use of sobriety checkpoints;

    • Facilitate the arrest process;

    • Implement state-of-the-art post-arrest investigation of apprehended impaired drivers;

    • Emphasize enforcement of youth impaired driving and drinking age laws; and
       
    • Emphasize enforcement of laws regulating alcohol or drug impairment by CMV drivers.

C. Prosecution

Sub-grantees should implement a comprehensive program for visible and aggressive prosecution of impaired driving cases. These programs should:

    • Give impaired driving cases high priority for prosecution;

    • Provide sufficient resources to prosecute cases presented by law enforcement efforts;

    • Facilitate uniformity and consistency in prosecution of impaired driving cases;

    • Provide training for prosecutors so they can obtain high rates of conviction and seek appropriate sanctions for offenders;

    • Encourage vigorous prosecution of alcohol-related fatality and injury cases under both impaired driving and general criminal statutes; and
       
    • Ensure that prosecutors are knowledgeable and prepared to prosecute youthful offenders appropriately.

D. Adjudication


The effectiveness of prosecution and enforcement efforts is lost without support and strength in adjudication. Sub-grantees should implement a comprehensive impaired driving adjudication program to:

• Provide sufficient resources to adjudicate cases and manage the dockets brought before them;

• Facilitate uniformity and consistency in adjudication of impaired driving cases;

• Give judges the skills necessary to appropriately adjudicate impaired driving cases;

• Inform the judiciary about technical evidence presented in impaired driving cases, including SFST and DEC testimony;

• Educate the judiciary in appropriate and aggressive sanctions for offenders including violators of commercial motor vehicle safety regulations; and

• Ensure that judges are knowledgeable and prepared to adjudicate youthful offenders cases in an appropriate and aggressive manner.

TREATMENT AND REHABILITATION
 

Many first-time impaired driving offenders and most repeat offenders have substantial substance abuse problems that affect their entire lives, not just their driving. They have been neither prevented nor deterred from impaired driving. Each Sub-grantee should implement a system to identify and refer these drivers to appropriate substance abuse treatment programs to change their dangerous behavior.
 

A. Diagnosis and Screening
 

Sub-grantees should have a systematic program to evaluate persons who have been convicted of an impaired driving offense to determine if they have an alcohol or drug abuse problem. This evaluation should:

    • Be conducted by qualified personnel prior to sentencing; and
       
    • Be used to decide whether a substance abuse treatment program should be part of the sanctions imposed.
B. Treatment and Rehabilitation
 

Sub-grantees should establish and maintain programs to treat alcohol and other drug dependent persons referred through traffic courts and other sources. These programs should:

    • Ensure that those referred for impaired driving offenses are not permitted to drive again until their substance abuse problems are under control;

    • Be conducted in addition to, not as a substitute for, license restrictions and other sanctions; and
       

    • Be conducted separately for youth.

PROGRAM MANAGEMENT
 

Good program management produces effective programs. Planning and coordination are especially important for impaired driving activities, since many different parties are involved. Each Sub-grantee's impaired driving program management system should have an established process for managing its planning (including problem identification), program control, and evaluation activities. The system should provide for a local task forces and data analysis. It also should include planning and coordination of activities with other agencies involved in impaired driving programs and expansion of existing partnerships, such as with the health and medical communities.
 

A. Program Planning
 

Sub-grantees should develop and implement an overall plan for all impaired driving activities. The plan should:

    • Be based on careful problem definition that makes use of crash and driver record data; and
       
    • Direct community resources toward effective measures that address impaired driving issues.

B. Program Control
 

Sub-grantees should establish procedures to ensure that program activities are implemented as intended. The procedures should provide for systematic monitoring and review of ongoing programs to:

    • Detect and correct problems quickly;
    • Measure progress in achieving established goals and objectives; and
       
    • Ensure that appropriate data are collected for evaluation.
C. Local Task Forces & Other Injury Control Programs
 

Sub-grantees should encourage the development of community impaired driving task forces and community traffic safety and other injury control programs. Sub-grantees should.

    • Use these groups to bring a wide variety of interests and resources to bear on impaired driving issues;

    • Ensure that Federal, State, and local organizations coordinate impaired driving activities, so that the activities complement rather than compete with each other; and
       
    • Ensure that these groups include traditional and non-traditional partners, such as law enforcement, local government, business, education, community groups, health, medicine, prosecutors and judges.

D. Data and Records
 

Sub-grantees should establish and maintain records systems for accidents, arrests, dispositions, driver licenses, and vehicle registrations. Especially important are tracking systems that can provide information on every driver arrested for DWI to determine the disposition of the case and compliance with sanctions. These records systems should be:

    • Accurate;
    • Timely;
    • Able to be linked to each other; and
       
    • Readily accessible to police, courts, and planners.
E. Evaluation
 

Sub-grantees should evaluate all impaired driving system activities regularly to ensure that programs are effective and scarce resources are allocated appropriately. Evaluation should be:

    • Designed to use available traffic records and other injury control data systems effectively;

    • Included in initial program planning to ensure that appropriate data are available and that adequate resources are allocated; and

    • Conducted regularly.

Evaluation results should be:

    • Reported regularly to project and program managers; and
       
    • Used to guide further program activities.

OCCUPANT PROTECTION
 

West Virginia, in cooperation with its political subdivisions, will have a comprehensive occupant protection program that educates and motivates its citizens to use available motor vehicle occupant protection systems. A combination of use requirements, enforcement, public information, education, and incentives is necessary to achieve significant, lasting increases in safety belt usage, which will prevent fatalities and control the number and severity of injuries. Therefore, a well-balanced State occupant protection program will include the components described below.
 

PROGRAM MANAGEMENT

Each sub-grantee should have centralized program planning, implementation and coordination to achieve and sustain high rates of safety belt use. Evaluation is also important for determining progress and ultimate success of occupant protection programs. The sub-grantee should:

  • Provide leadership, training, and technical assistance to other agencies and local occupant protection programs and projects;
  • Convene an occupant protection advisory task force or coalition to organize and generate broad-based support for programs;
  • Integrate occupant protection programs into community/corridor traffic safety and other injury prevention programs; and
     
  • Evaluate the effectiveness of its occupant protection program.
LEGISLATION, REGULATION, AND POLICY

Each sub-grantee should enact and enforce occupant protection use regulations and policies to provide clear guidance to the motoring public concerning motor vehicle occupant protection systems. This framework should include:

  • Require all motor vehicle occupants to use the systems provided by the vehicle manufacturer and educational programs to explain their benefits and the correct way to use them;

  • Require children up to 40 pounds to ride in a safety device certified by the manufacturer to meet all applicable Federal performance standards;

  • Require employees of all levels of government to wear safety belts when traveling on official business;
     
  • Require that organizations receiving Federal highway safety program grant funds have and enforce an employee safety belt use policy; and

ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM

Each sub-grantee should have a strong law enforcement program, coupled with public information and education, to increase safety belt and child safety seat use. Essential components of a law enforcement program include:

  • Written, enforced belt use policies for law enforcement agencies with sanctions for noncompliance to protect law enforcement officers from harm and for officers to serve as role models for the motoring public;

  • Vigorous enforcement of public safety belt use and child safety seat laws, including citations and warnings;

  • Accurate reporting of occupant protection system information on accident report forms, including use or non-use of belts or child safety seats, type of belt, and presence of and deployment of air bag;

  • Public information and education (PI&E) campaigns to inform the public about occupant protection laws and related enforcement activities;

  • Routine monitoring of citation rates for non-use of safety belts and child safety seats; and
     
  • Certification of an occupant protection training course for both basic and in-service training by the Police (or Peace) Officer Standards and Training (POST) board.
PUBLIC INFORMATION AND EDUCATION PROGRAM

As part of each State's public information and education program, each sub-grantee should enlist the support of a variety of media, including mass media, to improve public awareness and knowledge about safety belts, air bags, and child safety seats. To sustain or increase rates of safety belt and child safety seat use, a well organized, effectively managed public information program should:

  • Identify and target specific audiences, (e.g., low-use, high risk motorists) and develop messages appropriate for these audiences;

  • Address the enforcement of the State's belt use and child passenger safety laws; the safety benefits of regular, correct safety belt (both manual and automatic) and child safety seat use; and the additional protection provided by air bags;

  • Capitalize on special events, such as nationally recognized safety and injury prevention weeks and local enforcement campaigns;

  • Coordinate different materials and media campaigns where practicable, (e.g., by using a common theme and logo);

  • Use national themes and materials to the fullest extent possible;

  • Publicize belt-use surveys and other relevant statistics;

  • Encourage news media to report belt use and non-use in motor vehicle crashes;

  • Involve media representatives in planning and disseminating public information campaigns;

  • Encourage private sector groups to incorporate belt-use messages into their media campaigns;

  • Take advantage of all media outlets: television, radio, print, signs, billboards, theaters, sports events, health fairs; and
     
  • Evaluate all media campaign efforts

HEALTH/MEDICAL PROGRAM

Each State should integrate occupant protection into health programs. The failure of drivers and passengers to use occupant protection systems is a major public health problem that must be recognized by the medical and health care communities. Local medical organizations should collaborate in developing programs that:

  • Integrate occupant protection into professional health training curricula and comprehensive public health planning;

  • Promote occupant protection systems as a health promotion/injury prevention measure;

  • Require public health and medical personnel to use available motor vehicle occupant protection systems when on the job;
     
  • Provide technical assistance and education about the importance of motor vehicle occupant protection to primary caregivers, (e.g., doctors, nurses, clinic staff);

  • Include questions about safety belt use in health risk appraisals;

  • Utilize health care providers as visible public spokespersons for belt use and child safety seat use;

  • Provide information about availability of child safety seats through maternity hospitals and other pre-natal and natal care centers; and
     
  • Collect, analyze, and publicize data on additional injuries and medical expenses resulting from non-use of occupant protection devices.

CHILD PASSENGER SAFETY PROGRAM

Each sub-grantee should vigorously promote the use of child safety seats. Sub-grantees should insure that every child up to 40 pounds rides correctly secured in a child safety seat that meets Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards. Sub-grantees should establish child passenger safety programs that will help to:

  • Educate parents, pediatricians, hospitals, law enforcement, EMS and the general public about the safety risks to small children, the benefits of child safety seats, and their responsibilities for compliance with child passenger safety laws;

  • Encourage child safety seat retailers and auto dealers to provide information about child seat and vehicle compatibility, as well as correct use;

  • Require safe child transportation policies for certification of pre-school and day care providers;

  • Require hospitals to ensure that newborn and other small children are correctly secured in an approved child safety seat or safety belt upon discharge;

  • Make child safety seats available at affordable cost to low-income families, with appropriate education on how to use them; and
     
  • Encourage local law enforcement to vigorously enforce child passenger safety laws, including safety belt use laws as they apply to children.

SCHOOL-BASED PROGRAM

Buckling up is a good health habit and, like other health habits, must be taught at an early age and reinforced until the habit is well established. Sub-grantees should:

  • Ensure that highway safety and traffic-related injury control in general, and occupant protection in particular, are included in local health and safety education curricula;

  • Establish and enforce written policies requiring that school employees operating a motor vehicle on the job use safety belts; and
     
  • Encourage active promotion of regular safety belt use through classroom and extra-curricular activities as well as in the school-based health clinics.

WORKSITE PROGRAM

Each sub-grantee should encourage all employers to require safety belt use on the job. The Federal government has already taken that step for its employees. Private sector employers should follow the lead of Federal and State government employers and comply with all applicable FHWA Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations or Occupational Health and Safety (OSHA) regulations requiring private business employees to use safety belts on the job. All sub-grantees should encourage all local employers to:

  • Establish and enforce a safety belt use policy with sanctions; and
     
  • Conduct occupant protection education programs for employees on their belt use policies and the safety benefits of motor vehicle occupant protection.

OUTREACH PROGRAM

Each sub-grantee should encourage extensive community involvement in occupant protection education by involving individuals and organizations outside the traditional highway safety community. Community involvement broadens public support for the sub-grantee's programs and can increase the sub-grantee's ability to deliver highway safety education programs. To encourage community involvement, sub-grantees should:

  • Establish a coalition or task force of individuals and organizations to actively promote use of occupant protection systems;

  • Create an effective communications network among coalition members to keep members informed; and
     
  • Provide materials and resources necessary to conduct occupant protection education programs, especially directed toward young people, in local settings.

EVALUATION PROGRAM

Each sub-grantee should conduct several different types of evaluation to effectively measure progress and to plan and implement new program strategies. Program management should:

  • Conduct and publicize at least two observational surveys of safety belt and child safety seat use annually, making every effort to ensure that it meets applicable federal guidelines;

  • Maintain trend data on child safety seat use, safety belt use, and air bag deployment in fatal crashes;

  • Identify target populations through observational surveys and crash statistics;

  • Conduct and publicize statewide surveys of public knowledge and attitudes about occupant protection laws and systems;

  • Obtain monthly or quarterly data from law enforcement agencies on the number of safety belt and child passenger safety citations and convictions;

  • Evaluate the use of program resources and the effectiveness of existing general public and target population education programs;

  • Obtain data on morbidity as well as the estimated cost of crashes, compare on the basis of safety belt usage and non-usage; and
     
  • Ensure that evaluation results are an integral part of new program planning and problem identification.

POLICE TRAFFIC SERVICES
 

West Virginia, in cooperation with its political subdivisions, will have an efficient and effective police traffic services (PTS) program to enforce traffic laws, prevent crashes and their resulting deaths and injuries, assist the injured, document specific details of individual crashes, supervise crash clean-up, and restore safe and orderly movement of traffic. PTS is critical to the success of most traffic safety countermeasures and to the prevention of traffic-related injuries. Traffic law enforcement plays an important role in deterring impaired driving involving alcohol or other drugs, achieving safety belt use, encouraging compliance with speed laws, and reducing other unsafe driving actions. Experience has shown that a combination of highly visible enforcement, public information, education, and training is necessary to achieve a significant and lasting impact in reducing crashes, injuries, and fatalities. At a minimum, a well-balanced statewide PTS program should be made up of the components detailed below.
 

PROGRAM MANAGEMENT
  1. Planning and Coordination

Centralized program planning, implementation, and coordination are essential for achieving and sustaining effective PTS programs. The West Virginia Governor’s Highway Safety Program (GHSP), in conjunction with State, county and local law enforcement agencies, will ensure that these planning and coordinating functions are performed with regard to the State's traffic safety program, since law enforcement is a principle component. In carrying out its responsibility of centralized program planning and coordination, the GHSP will:

    • Provide leadership, training, and technical assistance to State, county and local law enforcement agencies;

    • Generate broad-based support for enforcement programs; and

    • Integrate PTS into community/corridor traffic safety and other injury prevention programs.
  1. Program Elements

State, county and local law enforcement agencies, in conjunction with the GHSP, will establish PTS as a priority within their total enforcement program. A PTS program should be built on a foundation of commitment, coordination, planning, monitoring, and evaluation within the agency's enforcement program. State, county and local law enforcement agencies should:

    • Provide the public with a high quality, effective PTS system and have enabling legislation and regulations in place to implement PTS functions;

    • Develop and implement a comprehensive enforcement plan for impaired driving involving alcohol or other drugs, safety belt use and child passenger safety laws, speeding, and other hazardous moving violations. The plan should initiate action to look beyond the issuance of traffic tickets to include enforcement of laws that cover the more significant portions of the safety problem and that address drivers of all types of vehicles, including trucks, automobiles, and motorcycles;

    • Develop a cooperative working relationship with other local, county, and State governmental agencies and community organizations on traffic safety issues;

    • Issue and enforce policies on roadside sobriety checkpoints, safety belt use, pursuit driving, crash investigating and reporting, speed enforcement, and serious traffic violations; and
       
    • Develop performance measures for PTS that are both qualitative and quantitative.

RESOURCE MANAGEMENT

GHSP will encourage law enforcement agencies to develop and maintain a comprehensive resource management plan to identify and deploy resources needed to effectively support enforcement programs. The resource management plan should include a specific component on traffic enforcement and safety, integrating traffic enforcement and safety initiatives into a total agency enforcement program. Law enforcement agencies should:

  • Conduct periodic assessments of service demands and resources to meet identified needs;
  • Develop a comprehensive resource management plan, including a specific traffic enforcement and safety component;
  • Define the plan in terms of budget requirements and services to be provided; and
     
  • Develop and implement operational policies for the deployment of resources to address program demands and to meet agency goals.
TRAFFIC LAW ENFORCEMENT

The enforcement of traffic laws and ordinances is a basic responsibility shared by all law enforcement agencies. The primary objective of this function is to encourage motorists and pedestrians to comply voluntarily with the laws. Administrators should apply their enforcement resources in ways that ensure the greatest safety impact. Traffic law enforcement programs should be based on:

  • Accurate problem identification;

  • Countermeasures designed to address specific problems;

  • Enforcement actions applied at appropriate times and places, coupled with a public information effort designed to make the motoring public aware of the problem and the planned enforcement action; and
     
  • A system to document and publicize results.

PUBLIC INFORMATION AND EDUCATION
  1. Necessity of Public Information and Education

Public awareness and knowledge about traffic enforcement are essential for sustaining increased compliance with all traffic laws. This requires a well-organized, effectively managed public information and education program. The GHSP, in cooperation with law enforcement agencies, will develop a statewide public information and education campaign that:

    • Identifies and targets specific audiences;

    • Addresses enforcement of safety belt use and child passenger safety, impaired driving involving alcohol or other drugs, speed, and other serious traffic laws;

    • Capitalizes on special events, such as Click It or Ticket, Operation C.A.R.E., Child Passenger Safety Awareness, Buckle Up, America! and Drunk and Drugged Driving Awareness campaigns;

    • Identifies and supports the efforts of traffic safety activist groups and the health and medical community to gain increased support of and attention to traffic safety and enforcement;

    • Uses national themes, events, and materials; and

    • Motivates the public to support increased enforcement of traffic laws.

The task of public information can be divided into two interconnected areas: external and internal information. Both areas, properly administered, will benefit the agency and work in concert to accomplish the goal of establishing and maintaining a positive police-public relationship.

  1. Development of public information and education functions by law enforcement agencies:

External

    • Educate and remind the public about traffic laws and safe driving behavior;

    • Disseminate information to the public about agency activities and accomplishments;

    • Enhance relationships with news media and the health and medical community;

    • Provide safety education and community services;

    • Provide legislative and judicial information and support; and

    • Increase the public's understanding of the enforcement agency's role in traffic safety.

Internal

    • Disseminate information about internal activities to sworn and civilian members of the agency;

    • Enhance the agency's safety enforcement role and increase employee understanding and support; and
       
    • Recognize employee achievements.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The availability of valid data is critical to any approach intended to increase the level of highway safety. An effective records program provides fast and accurate information to field personnel who are performing primary traffic functions and to management for decision-making. Data are usually collected from crash reports, daily officer activity reports that contain workload and citation information, highway department records (e.g., traffic volume), citizen complaints, and officer observations. An effective records program should:

    • Provide information rapidly and accurately;

    • Provide routine compilations of data for management use in the decision making process;

    • Provide data for operational planning and execution;

    • Interface with a variety of data systems, including statewide traffic safety records system; and

    • Be accessible to enforcement, planners, and management.
TRAINING

Training is one of the most important activities in a law enforcement agency, and it is essential to support the special requirements of traffic law enforcement and safety. It is essential for operational personnel to be prepared to effectively perform their duties. Traffic enforcement training can be conducted by the agency, a State agency, or a commercial trainer.

  1. Purpose and Goals of Training

Training accomplishes a variety of important and necessary goals. Proper training should:

    • Prepare officers to act decisively and correctly;
    • Increase compliance with agency enforcement goals;
    • Assist in meeting priorities;
    • Improve compliance with established policies;
    • Result in greater productivity and effectiveness;
    • Foster cooperation and unity of purpose;
    • Help offset liability actions; and
    • Motivate and enhance officer professionalism.

  1. State, county and local law enforcement agencies should:
    • Periodically assess enforcement activities to determine training needs;

    • Require traffic enforcement knowledge and skills in all recruits;

    • Provide traffic enforcement in-service training to experienced officers;

    • Provide specialized CMV in-service training to traffic enforcement officers;

    • Conduct training to implement specialized traffic enforcement skills, techniques, or programs; and

    • Train instructors, to increase agency capabilities and to ensure continuity of specialized enforcement skills and techniques.
EVALUATION

The GHSP, in conjunction with State, county and local law enforcement agencies, will develop a comprehensive evaluation program to measure progress toward established project goals and objectives; effectively plan and implement statewide, county and local PTS programs; optimize the allocation of limited resources; measure the impact of traffic enforcement on reducing crime and traffic crashes, injuries, and deaths; and compare costs of criminal activity to costs of traffic crashes. Law enforcement managers should:

  • Include evaluation in initial program planning efforts to ensure that data will be available and that sufficient resources will be allocated;

  • Report results regularly to project and program managers, to police field commanders and officers, and to the public and private sectors;

  • Use results to guide future activities and to assist in justifying resources to legislative bodies;

  • Conduct a variety of surveys to assist in determining program effectiveness, such as roadside sobriety surveys, speed surveys, license checks, belt use surveys, and surveys measuring public knowledge and attitudes about traffic enforcement programs;

  • Evaluate the effectiveness of services provided in support of priority traffic safety areas; and
     
  • Maintain and report traffic data to the International Association of Chiefs of Police Traffic Data Report and other appropriate repositories, such as the FBI Uniform Crime Report, FHWA's SAFETY NET system, and annual statewide reports.

TRAFFIC RECORDS
 

West Virginia, in cooperation with its political subdivisions, will establish and implement a complete and comprehensive traffic records program. The Statewide program will include, or provide for, data for the entire State. A complete and comprehensive traffic records program is essential for the development and operation of a viable Safety Management System and effective traffic-related injury control efforts. It is also essential for the performance of planning, problem identification, operational management and control, tracking of safety trends, and the implementation and evaluation of highway safety countermeasures and activities. It is the essential ingredient to safety effectiveness and management.
 

TRAFFIC RECORDS SYSTEM

To provide a complete and useful record system for safety program management at both the State and local level, the State should have a database consisting of the following:

  • A Crash File with data on the time, environment, and circumstances of a crash; identification of the vehicles, drivers, cyclists, occupants, and pedestrians involved; and documentation of crash consequences (fatalities, injuries, property damage and violations charged) with the data tied to a location reference system;

  • A Driver File or driver history record of licensed drivers in the State, with data on personal identification and driver license number, type of license, license status (suspended or revoked), driver restrictions, driver convictions for traffic violations, crash history, driver control or improvement actions, and safety education data;

  • A Vehicle File with information on identification, and ownership

  • A Roadway File with information about roadway location, identification, and classification as well as a description of a road's total physical characteristics, which are tied to a location reference system. This file should also contain data for normalizing purposes, such as miles of roadway and average daily traffic (ADT);

  • A Commercial Motor Vehicle Crash File which uses uniform data definitions and collects information on the vehicle configuration, cargo body type, hazardous materials, information to identify the motor carrier, as well as information on the crash;

  • A Citation/Conviction File which identifies the type of citation and the time, date, and location of the violation; the violator, vehicle and the enforcement agency; and adjudication action and results, including court of jurisdiction and fines assessed and collected;

  • An Emergency Medical Services (EMS) file with emergency care and victim outcome information about ambulance responses to crashes, e.g., emergency care unit, care given, injury data, and times of EMS notification and arrival; information on emergency facility and hospital care, including Trauma Registry data; and medical outcome data relative to crash victims receiving rehabilitation and for those who died as the result of the crash; and

  • Provisions for file linkage through common data elements between the files or through other consistent means; performance level data as part of the traffic records system; demographic data to normalize or adjust for exposure when analyzing the various data in the files; and provisions for the use of cost data relative to amoun